You can make a pretty straightforward financial case for downsizing in retirement.
Sell a home that’s appreciated significantly, move somewhere smaller and less expensive, unlock equity, reduce costs, and simplify your lifestyle. If you’re a Bay Area homeowner, you’ve likely watched your property value climb for decades, which makes the prospect of selling even more compelling.
That is, until you run the numbers.
Capital gains exposure on a home purchased in the 1990s, for example, can be substantial — likely well above the federal exclusion. Transaction costs on a high-value home can reach six to eight percent of the sale price before you’ve packed a single box. And in California’s real estate market, a smaller house doesn’t necessarily translate to a less expensive one. The net equity unlocked can be less than expected, and that’s before weighing the costs, financially and emotionally, to move.
All that said, I don’t mean to suggest downsizing is the wrong decision. There’s a good chance it’s the right one. My point is it’s not as simple as it may seem, especially in California. Let’s walk through the factors you should consider before selling your home.
The Financial Case For Downsizing
Unlocking home equity. For many of the Bay Area retirees we work with, the family home is one of their largest assets — even larger than their investment portfolios. Downsizing converts that illiquid equity into investable assets. Deployed strategically, the proceeds can help generate retirement income, reduce dependence on portfolio withdrawals, and improve overall financial sustainability.
Reduced costs. Smaller homes can offer the benefits of lower home maintenance costs, reduced utility bills, and potentially no mortgage payments. In the Bay Area, the dollar difference between the ongoing costs of a large single-family home and a smaller condo or townhome can be material. Not to mention the fact that older, larger homes are relatively more prone to unpredictable capital expenses (a new roof, HVAC system, or foundation repair).
Lifestyle alignment. A home sized for a family of four may no longer match a household of two. Single-story floor plans, walkability, proximity to healthcare, and access to transportation matter more as retirement progresses.
The California-Specific Financial Picture
Capital Gains Tax
It’s safe to say Bay Area homes have appreciated over the years. Many long-held properties have embedded gains well above the federal primary residence exclusion ($250,000 for single filers and $500,000 for married couples filing jointly), which applies only if you’ve lived in the home for at least two of the last five years.
Gains above that threshold face two or three layers of taxation:
- Federal long-term capital gains rates of 0%, 15%, or 20% depending on income
- A 3.8% Net Investment Income Tax (NIIT) for higher earners
- California state income tax at ordinary income rates, which reach as high as 13.3%. California does not offer a preferential rate for capital gains.
At the top combined rate, the federal and California tax burden on non-excluded gains can approach 37%.
To give you an idea of potential tax liability, imagine a couple who purchased their home in 1995 for $400,000 sells it today for $2.5 million, the $2.1 million gain exceeds the $500,000 exclusion by $1.6 million. Even accounting for documented improvements and selling costs that reduce the taxable gain, the combined federal and state tax bill could be enormous.
Before that number sends you back to the drawing board, know that there are strategies to soften the blow. For instance, tax-loss harvesting in your investment portfolio can help offset some exposure over time. With enough runway and proactive planning, the bill can be more manageable than you’d think.
Proposition 19 and Property Tax Portability
Before making any decision, California homeowners 55 or older should understand Proposition 19, which took effect April 1, 2021.
Prop 19 allows qualifying homeowners to transfer their existing property tax base (typically far below current assessed value under Prop 13’s 1% cap and 2% annual increase limit) to a replacement home anywhere in California. If the replacement home costs the same as or less than the original, the full tax base transfers. If it costs more, the tax base adjusts upward by the difference. The benefit is available up to three times, and only one spouse needs to be 55 or older at the time of sale.
Why does this matter? Without Prop 19 planning, moving to a smaller but still expensive California home could lead to a sizable property tax increase — even if the purchase price is lower than the sale price of the original home. With proper planning, that increase could be minimized or eliminated.
Consider a couple paying $4,500 annually in property taxes on a home they’ve owned since the early 1990s — a reflection of the Prop 13 assessed value from that era. If they sell and purchase a comparably priced replacement home without using Prop 19, their property tax bill may reset to account for current market value. In the Bay Area, it’s not unrealistic for such a bill to be ten times higher. Prop 19, used correctly, protects against that outcome.
Transaction Costs
Selling a home isn’t free. Real estate agent fees, escrow costs, transfer taxes, moving expenses, and the cost of furnishing or adapting a new space all cut into net proceeds. In California, combined transaction costs on a high-value home can easily reach six to eight percent of the sale price. On a $2 million home, that’s $120,000 to $160,000 before a dollar of proceeds has been invested.
The Financial Case For Staying
The Prop 13 advantage. Long-term California homeowners often have extremely low property tax bills relative to current home value. Selling forfeits this advantage unless Prop 19 portability is used effectively — and even with portability, a replacement home above a certain price point will result in some tax base adjustment.
Aging in place. Home modifications (e.g., accessibility upgrades, safety improvements, single-floor living adaptations) can extend the practicality of staying in a larger home at a potentially lower cost than a move. You can’t put a value on established neighborhoods, longstanding social connections, and the practical familiarity of a home lived in for decades.
The replacement market reality. Downsizing in the California real estate market may not lead to a better financial situation. In many Bay Area markets, the price per square foot of condos and townhomes has increased proportionally with single-family homes. The net equity unlocked may be smaller than expected, particularly after capital gains taxes and transaction costs.
Reverse mortgage as an alternative. If you want to access equity without selling, a reverse mortgage allows those 62 and older to borrow against home equity without monthly payments. It’s not right for everyone, and it’s certainly not free. The loan balance grows over time as interest compounds on the outstanding balance, reducing the home equity available to you later and ultimately diminishing what passes to heirs. The loan also becomes due if you sell the home, move out permanently, or pass away.
The Emotional Side of the Decision
What the home represents. A long-held family home is, for many people, the physical embodiment of decades of life. It’s where children grew up. It’s where memories were made. Leaving can feel like a loss, even when it’s objectively the right financial and practical decision. That’s not to say new memories can’t be made elsewhere (as they say, home is where the heart is), but, inevitably, this will come up in the decision-making process.
Decluttering. If you’ve lived in your house for years or even decades, you’ve likely accumulated a lot of stuff. Decluttering can be cathartic and/or exhausting. Storage units are an option, but ongoing storage costs may erode the financial benefits of downsizing over time.
The social circle. Moving can disrupt established networks of neighbors, communities, and routines cultivated over the years. Retirement communities generally offer substantive social infrastructure in return, but the transition takes time and isn’t guaranteed to replicate what you’re used to. Proximity to adult children and grandchildren factors significantly into the decision, sometimes in favor of moving and sometimes strongly in favor of staying.
The downsizing question is, at its core, a Life After Work question: what kind of life do I actually want to live and does staying here help me do so? For some people, that vision centers on flexibility, simplicity, and new experiences. For others, it’s rooted in continuity, community, and the stability of a place deeply known.
Making the Decision
Whether downsizing makes sense depends on your specific financial circumstances, the emotional readiness of everyone affected, and how you envision this next chapter of life.
A few questions to answer before deciding:
- What will net proceeds be after capital gains tax, transaction costs, and the cost of the replacement home?
- Have you modeled the Prop 19 property tax portability implications against your specific situation?
- Will your cost of living increase, decrease, or stay the same in your new area?
- How does the equity unlocked affect your retirement income picture and portfolio withdrawal rate?
- Are you and your partner aligned on the emotional aspects of this decision?
For California retirees, the financial variables involved are complex enough that it’s worth modeling the variables before making any decisions. At BEW, we help clients think through both the financial and personal factors of major Life After Work decisions, including if and when downsizing makes sense for their specific situation.
Get the BEW Newsletter Direct to Your Inbox
Stay informed with timely perspectives and market insights from the BEW Invest team.
